Just a follow up to my last blog, Asafa Powell
claims
[1] that he was a victim of a contaminated supplement i.e. the oxilofrene he
tested positive for was not a listed ingredient in Ephinany D1. I think this is true; he therefore has a case
that, in this regard, the 18-month ban is longer than some that have been
handed down for similar offences. He may well win an appeal at the Court of
Arbitration for Sport.
However, I would contend that the unbanned
“stimulants” that are listed on the Epiphany D1 label are not that different to
oxilofrene if taken in high doses. Aniracetam in particular is a prescription
drug used to treat central nervous system disorders, such as Alzheimer’s
Disease. If Powell was taking it in a pure pill form as a patient, he would surely
have declared it on a therapeutic exemption certificate. I am assuming that
Epiphany D1 was not listed on any form as athletes, and their coaches, try to keep
their supplement regimes as secret as their training regime. In any case I
don’t see much difference between taking a cognitive enhancer such as
aniracetam versus a banned stimulant like modafinil which has resulted in any
number of doping bans (see my book for details).
As an aside it does seem to me that Powell
has a case to sue the manufacturers of Epiphany D1, Dynamic Life Nutrition, LLC for loss of earnings and reputation. They
even have a GMP (or “Good Manufacturing Practice”) label on their web page
after all - though it is rather fuzzy and difficult to read. However, a quick read of
their terms and conditions [2], suggests
otherwise:
“OUR AGGREGATE LIABILITY (WHETHER FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT, TORT OR ANY
OTHER LEGAL THEORY) SHALL IN NO CIRCUMSTANCES EXCEED THE COST OF THE PRODUCTS
YOU ORDERED.”
And even better:
“Company neither endorses nor is responsible for the accuracy or
reliability of any opinion, advice or statement on the Company Websites”
and again:
“It is your responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness or
usefulness of any information, opinion, advice or other content available
through the Company Websites. Please seek the advice of professionals, as
appropriate, regarding the evaluation of any specific information, opinion,
advice or other content, including but not limited to financial, health, or
lifestyle information, opinion, advice or other content.”
Caveat emptor
No comments:
Post a Comment